Martinelli’s
Our team visited the Martinelli’s facility in Watsonville, California, a well-known apple juice processing company. During the visit, we were introduced to patulin, a harmful and difficult-to-mitigate mycotoxin that can contaminate apples and their byproducts. We learned that patulin contamination not only presents serious food safety risks but also carries major financial consequences for stakeholders at every stage of the supply chain, from farmers and processors to distributors and consumers.
In our meeting with the head of Quality Assurance, we were guided through the entire production pathway, from apple harvest to juice processing. This tour highlighted where and how patulin contamination can occur, and revealed the limitations of current mitigation strategies since pasteurization cannot neutralize mycotoxins like patulin. Regulations therefore play a critical role, setting strict limits on allowable patulin levels in apple-based products, which highlighted to us that it was important for our project to operate in the current regulatory frameworks that are in place. Martinelli’s also explained how contaminated apples and byproducts impact not just juice production but also broader agricultural avenues, such as animal feed. This was our first look into how a single contamination point can ripple across multiple sectors of the food supply chain.
After learning about the industry’s established patulin detection and control methods, such as rigorous testing, filtration systems, and regulatory oversight, we shared with Martinelli’s our early ideas for new bioengineering approaches. We proposed concepts around enzymatic and non-enzymatic decontamination strategies and asked for their perspective on feasibility, flavor preservation, and production compatibility. Their feedback was invaluable: Martinelli’s explained that, while patulin is a challenge, it is relatively well controlled in apple juice production. They emphasized that the industry is more concerned about other mycotoxins, which are far more dangerous, less regulated in certain contexts, and more difficult to control with current tools.
This exchange was pivotal in shaping our project direction. With Martinelli’s insight, we realized that focusing solely on patulin would have limited impact, as the industry already has effective monitoring systems in place. Instead, we made the decision to pivot toward aflatoxin B1, a more prevalent and hazardous mycotoxin. At the same time, their input encouraged us to pursue a non-enzymatic route of decontamination, ensuring that our method would not risk altering the flavor, consistency, or marketability of other crop-derived products.
The visit also broadened our perspective: we began to see mycotoxin contamination not as an isolated issue confined to apples, but as a widespread food safety challenge across many agricultural sectors. This expanded scope reinforced the potential for our aptamer-based detection and filtration technology. With Martinelli’s feedback in mind, we refined our design to address not only the scientific challenge of binding and neutralizing toxins, but also the practical needs of processors, such as integration into existing workflows and cost efficiency.
Ultimately, Martinelli’s gave us much more than an understanding of patulin; they helped us situate our work within the real world context of agricultural processing. Their feedback guided us to focus on aflatoxin B1 while also highlighting the versatility and scalability of our approach. This engagement made clear that our project could serve multiple stakeholders across the agricultural value chain, with the potential to transform food safety protocols beyond apples and into a wide range of crops and industries.